In Work Package 1 we propose to (a) elucidate the microbial influence on the invasive traits of Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata by adopting a high throughput sequencing and functional metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approach coupled with a culture dependent approach for the identification of microbial fitness drivers, (b) examine population dynamics under different climate change scenarios, (c) prepare a local scale pattern of population dispersal in the anthropised environment using advanced genetic tools, and (d) integrate a modelling-based approach simulating invasion scenarios based on species-specific behavioural and developmental data with a spatio-temporal study of localised trapping data in urban habitats.
Work package leader:
Deliverables:
In this work package we will decipher the effects of invasion and its ecological impact: i) on individuals by testing the performance and traits of native European species with different diet breadth facing their invasive competitors (Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata); ii) the effects of the gut microbiota community of the invasive species during competition; iii) the impacts on ecosystem functions in looking at the resource pools and supply rates of fleshy fruits, then, we will consider modelling fruitfly survival in hypothetical refugia; iv) finally we propose a meta-analysis of available published data on impact of both target species.
Work package leader:
Deliverables:
In Work Package 3 we will develop a) a prototype interception kit (PIK) for rapid onsite interception of fruitfly larvae and b) a metabolomics pipeline to identify male quality markers for improved mass-rearing. We will first establish a protocol for species identification at the larval stage for Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata, and for other EU priority pests, based on the CRISPR/Cas12a technology (Task 3.1). We will exploit both barcoding sequences and the newly developed Tephritid genomic resources (produced by Work Package 4). Once the protocol will be established, we will devise a prototype kit and test it on lab and wild larvae of Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata (Task 3.2). Work Package 3 will also develop a metabolomics pipeline for the analysis of male reproductive organs and gut of Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata to identify markers of mating performance to facilitate quality control operations. We will collect the target tissues from the Ceratitis capitata VIENNA 8 genetic sexing strains, our model strain, and from Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata lab strains, reared on different larval diets and after irradiation (Task 3.3), and then analyse their metabolomes (Task 3.4). The metabolomics pipeline will be developed in VIENNA 8 and then applied to Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata strains, for which quality control parameters will be assessed. The metabolomics data will be cross-linked to evaluate a generic set of quality markers transferrable to other EU priority insect plant pests and that will be provided to mass-rearing facilities worldwide to reduce/optimise efforts in quality control tests, eventually decreasing operational costs.
Work package leader:
Deliverables:
Work Package 4 will develop precise, rapid, and reliable methods to de novo construct genetic sexing strains for target species. Latest sequencing and bioinformatic technologies will be used to build a generic and transferable pipeline to characterise fruitfly Y chromosomes and find suitable areas for genetic engineering (Task 4.1). The pipeline will be based on genomic and transcriptomic datasets already available from studies in Ceratitis capitata and Bactrocera oleae by our participants, will be first established in Ceratitis capitata, and then transferred to Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata. A generic, genetic engineering pipeline to insert endogenous sequences on Y chromosomes via CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing, called the "neoclassical method", will be developed, and tested in Ceratitis capitata (Task 4.2). The gene to insert on the Y will be based on the highly conserved pupal color white pupae gene, whose knockout results in white instead of the naturally brown pupae. This gene has already been mutated on autosomes. It will now be rescued male-specifically by providing the Y chromosome with a white pupae rescue allele. Once developed, genetic sexing strains pupae can be sorted for white (female) versus brown (male) pupae, and male-only populations are sterilised for release. The performance of neoclassical genetic sexing strains will be compared to the currently in use classical Ceratitis capitata genetic sexing strains (VIENNA 8). After establishing the proof-of-concept methodology in Ceratitis capitata, Work Package 4 will ambitiously translate both pipelines to generate genetic sexing strains in Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata (Task 4.3 and 4.4). The resulting strains will be evaluated for fitness parameters in our laboratories (Task 4.4) and tested under mass-rearing conditions (Task 4.4).
Work package leader:
Deliverables:
Work Package 5 will develop a rapid and efficient response to outbreaks aiming to prohibit establishment and eliminate dispersion to different areas and countries. To address objective 1, we use Ceratitis capitata, a model species for SIT, that exists in low density populations in well-characterised areas of Northern Greece that resemble early stages of invasion (establishment of small, dispersed populations). Data regarding Ceratitis capitata dispersion in a temperate area of northern Greece will be used to select appropriate pilot sites. These sites will be thoroughly characterised in terms of ecological and climatic properties that may affect Ceratitis capitata population growth and dispersion (Task 5.3). The gathered data and the background information will be used to generate outbreaks containment scenarios, based on the PESTonFARM platform (Task 5.4), which will be pilot-tested for two consecutive years (Task 5.5). An aggressive response strategy will be tested in European orchards against fruitfly. Following simulation experiments, we will assess, if the Ceratitis capitata-developed and tested strategy can be adapted for Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata (Task 5.6). To establish the symbiont-enhanced SIT as the main tool of a fruitfly outbreak containment strategy and also for integrated pest management, a novel emergency-response rearing facility for the production of enhanced Ceratitis capitata males will be established in Task 5.1, which could easily be adapted to both Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata. The performance and quality of produced enhanced males will be screened through laboratory, field cage, and open field trials (Task 5.2) and their integration into the outbreak containment scenarios in Task 5.4 and Task 5.6. Work package 5 will engage stakeholders including phytosanitary inspectors, fruit growers' organisations, and policy implementation officials.
Work package leader:
Deliverables:
Work package 6 will involve multiple stakeholders from the beginning through workshops (in part online) and questionnaires to have fair estimates of costs and benefits as a baseline. An important dimension will be assessing the farmers' and other stakeholders' perceptions regarding invasive pests and the damage they cause, as this will affect the actions and detail the valuation of cost and benefits. Another dimension is assessing their perceptions regarding various control methods and the facilitating factors and obstacles to uptake certain tools/strategies. We will conduct meetings with stakeholders in Europe and South Africa. In South Africa, Bactrocera dorsalis is already present, and SIT-based methods are tested in other species, thus providing vital information to refine the data on cost and benefits and the acceptability of SIT-based strategies, e.g., pest-free vs infested areas (Task 6.1 and Task 6.2). The work package will review existing literature and data on damage and control costs, current concepts in terms of economic analysis and new models and explore how they can be linked to the economic analysis model (Task 6.3). Work package 6 will then conduct a multi-dimensional evaluation of SIT-based rapid eradication strategies to tackle invasive fruitfly to foster economically and environmentally sound pest management. This requires an assessment of the impacts of diverse fruitfly invasion and control scenarios. First, we will identify the range of impacts of outcomes from the REACT project methods, tools, kit, strategies, and standard operating procedures, followed by their valuation and comparison to existing parameters. To identify impacts, work package 6 is consulting work packages 2- 5, and information will be gathered about the various costs components of the developed REACT strategies. We will feed those data for cost and benefit analysis into a previously developed economic model and adapt it by incorporating a range of dimensions related to the impact of invasion on fruit production, alternative hosts /ecology, fruit marketing, comparison to other control strategies such as pesticide-based strategies, and integrated pest management (Task 6.4). Using the economic model and the data/information collected, an economic analysis of the REACT strategies will be performed (Task 6.5) and explicitly quantified for Bactrocera dorsalis in South Africa (Task 6.6).
Work package leader:
Deliverables:
Work package 7 will spread the project and its results to the public. This includes the general external project communication on different channels (e.g., website, social media, videos), the targeted dissemination to science and politics as well as the exploitation of the project results on commercial and non-commercial ways that ensure the outputs and lessons learned from the project to contribute to a more resilient agriculture. At the beginning a comprehensive strategy and technical infrastructure is developed as a basis (Task 7.1) for the following implementation of the different communication measures (Task 7.2) ensuring the widest possible awareness of the project. The exploitation of the project results will consist of developing commercial and non-commercial exploitation scenarios, defining a strategy for utilisation of the project findings in practice and evaluating the commercial use of results under patent protection (Task 7.3). All project partners will have their stake in the project communication measures and provide information to the work package leader. In a series of communications workshops the mutual key messaging, narration and communication approach will be continuously developed and iterated during the project.
Work package leader:
Deliverables:
Coordination of REACT will require sound governance and an adequate management structure to ensure the most efficient collaboration between all partners, stakeholders, and the European Commission. This includes governance to monitor project progress towards set objectives, to anticipate possible hurdles, to solve such issues and to ensure fulfilment of the highest ethical and biosafety standards by all partners.
Deliverables:
This work package sets out the 'ethics requirements' that the project must comply with.
Deliverables: